Skip to content

My incredibly sophisticated book classification system

So, as I have griped previously (no surprise that it should be in a post concerning a specific book), we are moving. Yes, it is only to the house next door (same landlord, has a bit more space, better insulation, etc.), but damn is it ever stressful right now. Particularly for me as I try to weed through the 1,000+ book collection I have amassed over the last decade at this address. In the last 48 hours, via the “keep your stuff out of landfills at all costs” project, Freecycle, I have given away something in the neighborhood of 300 books. Of my efforts to organize the surviving volumes, earlier this afternoon, I remarked on Twitter:

Screw alphabetical order. Books shall have 2 categories: ‘Yucky’ (sad/scary nonfiction/reference) & ‘Yummy’ (best of fiction/memoir/poetry).

(and then, later:)

(And don’t remind me that there’s plenty of crossover between the categories! Today I have *zero* tolerance for ambiguity, despite the bio1.)

So, as if I don’t have enough diversions that enable my slacking off on the packing, I thought I’d take a moment to distinguish what I mean by the “Yummy” and “Yucky” delineations. Mind you, I only had my crappy camera phone with me when I snapped these shots in what will soon be my new office next door (also: what appears in the two shots still doesn’t include all the books, even after the purges of the last two days). I’ve made some little notes on the Flickr pages (click through to read) for some titles of note.

Books that are yummy (click through for notes on individual titles):

yummy

Books that are yucky (click through for description below picture; photo’s too grainy to really make out any of the titles, which is just as well, but my reasons for classifying them in the “yucky” category are best explained on the Flickr page):

yucky
__

1 At the moment, my bio on my Twitter page reads as follows:

Suspiciously tolerant of ambiguity. Owner of “colorful” history. Eviscerates sacred cows. Sometimes devastating, sometimes funny. (NOT for the faint of heart.)

  • mikeb302000
    I love your Yucky / Yummy system, I think mainly because I love books. Anything to do with organizing them or not organizing them is for me. In my case an unusual system has evolved. I guess the total must be 1000 +, which although we moved into a bigger house 2 years ago, far exceeds the space available. I left several massive boxes unpacked in the garage, boxes containing 50 or 80 volumes randomly selected in the days immediately prior to our move. As we grew into the new house, the three adults and three children which comprise my immediate family, we gradually discovered that there'd never be enough space for all the beloved books. So, every few months I take a box from the garage, struggle it up the stairs to the house, and exchange its contents with stuff that's on the shelves, more or less maintaining random selection. By now I've recycled between garage and house all the books we own at least once. It's proven to be a wonderful way to keep refreshing what's visible on the shelves while maintaining a sense of anticipation at regularly discovering long lost friends.
  • EmilyBrianna
    My ex-girlfriend, an art director at an ad agency, had a shelf in our living room with a lovely color-coded shelving system -- an entire spectrum of books in which I, the librarian in the relationship, could find nothing. She despised my Dewey systemed bookshelf almost as much. She's dating another art director now, and I'm sure their home is beautiful and disorienting.

    Since having children, my books are organized with only one imperative: that MAMA'S SPECIAL NIGHT TIME BOOKS stay on the tippity-topmost shelf.

    Good work, Marinelli.
  • Bwa ha ha ha. Mama's special night time books, I'm going to be giggling about that (along with "I'm sure their home is beautiful and disorienting") all day now, thanks :)
blog comments powered by Disqus