Skip to content

Book I’m promoting the hell out of, even though it won’t be out for many more months.

02-Aug-10

The Revolution Starts at Home: Confronting Intimate Violence Within Activist Communities

I’m so excited about The Revolution Starts at Home: Confronting Partner Abuse Within Activist Communities 1(Editors: Ching-In Chen, Jai Dulani, and Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha), I pre-ordered it about three months ago, even though it’s not expected to ship until March 3, 2011!

Its topic has been ignored for far too long, and I’m hoping this will be an important contribution to the literature.

If you’d like, you can pre-order directly from (the consistently awesome) South End Press here, or from Amazon. (It’s also listed at my beloved Powell’s, but they don’t yet have a pre-order option.)

__
1 In some places, the title is listed instead as The Revolution Starts at Home: Confronting Intimate Violence Within Activist Communities.

I’m sorry, Dad.

02-Jun-10

Really, I’m going to call you soon. (Yes, I said that four days ago. Hell, I meant it! And I mean it now, too. Anyway.)

Failing that, I will email.

Or send smoke signals, which, as you note in the above-embedded voice mail, is one of many communication possibilities.

I’m not dragging my feet to be a jerk.

I’m dragging my feet because they feel as if they are encased in concrete, pulling me downward through the family history, and it’s hard to manage sentences when one is also contending with the sensation of suffocation.

As we speak, I am chipping away at that concrete. Hear that? Chip chip chip.

Dad, for both our sakes, I hope you’re not reading this. Or anything else I publish, here or elsewhere. There are reasons I rarely send out work, despite your kind chastisements, “writer to writer.”

Chief among them: That I fear – with basis, if the past is any indication – that my doing so could cause you no end of grief. (To say nothing of possible effects on my mother, from whom I’ve spent more cumulative years estranged, even, than I have from you.)

“It would kill your father…” – Do you have any idea how often I’ve been told that, by third parties who are, or have been, close to us both? (Don’t answer that.)

Right or wrong, I believe it.

Still: I hope, somehow, that you’re feeling this.

Because, although you’ve done all kinds of irrevocable fucking up, I do love you.

And not only due to the occasional “war reparations.”

Of course, that love would exist, just as surely, without such reparations.

It never went away, in the first place.

Even after 1984, when you kicked me out.

Even between 1991 and 1997, when you did not know whether I was alive or dead (and had reason to fear the latter).

And even, yes, after 2006 – when I learned… [that horrifying, as yet unpublishable thing].

But because you’re my dad, and you get me – in some ways, more than anyone else ever has, or ever could.

I’m sorry, Dad.

[hours later, edited to add: Update.]

Full-page advertisement for British Petroleum, The Nation, Vol. 290:15, April 19, 2010 (back cover).

24-May-10

…exactly one day before what is rapidly shaping up to be the largest oil spill in U.S. history1.

Idea for my fellow and sister liberals (of which side of the US political spectrum The Nation is billed as a journalistic “flagship”): How about we stop allowing corrupt industry forces, such as British Petroleum, to use our communities and media enterprises as “image laundry”?

[Brief text continues below image.]

Full-page advertisement, The Nation, issue dated one day before BP's Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Also: Could we work harder and more creatively to keep afloat2 essential publications like The Nation, so their publishers might not feel the need to accept such advertising?

Because BP’s catastrophic oil stains aren’t going to wash out any time soon.

__

1 Obviously, April 19, 2010 wouldn’t have been the date the issue actually went to press or was first available to readers, but seeing this full-page ad on the back of this publication, beloved to me for many years, with that date on it, was beyond startling.

2To subscribe to The Nation, go here; to donate, go here. Alas, for my part – with my husband still laid off – I can afford to do neither; I scored this recent back issue from the free magazines bin at Diversity Thrift. But if I could, I absolutely would.

To the boy in my kid’s fourth grade class who has incorporated ‘loudly boasting of raping women* in video games’ into his bullying routine:

20-May-10

You and your parents are about to be in some serious trouble. (I pity you, insofar as you have the sort of parents who have allowed you to adopt these behaviors, but YOU. WILL. NOT. BULLY. MY. DAUGHTER.)

As will be the school, if they continue to tolerate this sort of horribleness.

I really, really hope you can get competent help (be that from a familial, pastoral, psychotherapeutic, and/or other appropriate source) before you grow into something irrevocably monstrous.

I also have a hard time imagining that, given your behavior, you are not suffering serious abuse at home (beyond what, arguably, may be inherent emotional abuse in allowing you to play such games). As a mother – and as an abuse survivor – that distresses me. With that possibility in mind, I will sincerely hold you in the Light (while we’re at it? Knock it off with constantly teasing my daughter for being a Quaker), and hope some kind of healing can grow from this ugly and upsetting moment.

God help you, as folks say. (Note that when I say it, I invoke two meanings at once: First, as a warning, because my job – my privilege – is to protect my children; and second, as a sincere, fully articulated prayer.)

Everybody else:

This isn’t about free speech, or even about whether 10 year olds should have access to video games which depict rape**. It’s about the fact that my ten year old daughter is being harassed, sexually and otherwise. A bully of this temperament, absent the particular cues found in video game representations of sexual violence – as profoundly destructive as I believe these are – would surely find, or invent another pretext for acting like a smug, entitled brute toward others, with particular targeting, in this case, based on my daughter’s gender, in addition to our family’s practiced faith.

__

* Yes, this fourth grader is actually using the words “rape” and “raping.” In fact, it is owing to these boasts that I have had the jarring experience of hearing, for the first time, my youngest daughter using those particular words. This is heartbreaking to me (especially considering this recent discussion with her big sister).

** If the kid specifically named what video game or games he was referring to (this, at least, would be consistent with the sorts of activities described), my daughter didn’t retain this information. (And I am so okay with that.)

__
EDIT: My lovely, feminist gaming friend Annie (shoesonwrong) had excellent feedback on this post, to which I responded via this blog’s little sister, marinelli’s miscellany (my Tumblr, to those who speak that).

The sad thing is, I am not likely to run out of material any time soon.

14-May-10

gotmefired.bmp
From a side project, described briefly here.

While the idea for the Twitter account is “Shit That Got Me Fired” (@gotmefired, at left), extracting anecdotes from my long march toward unemployability, the broader work in progress will likely have another title (Canned Victoria Shitcanned: A Life in Day Jobs is one I’m kicking around).

It won’t happen this year, either

08-May-10

it's better this year … but the pain is much less (both the physical and the emotional), and I am more at peace.

Happy Mother’s Day to all.

Oh, Amazon product recommendations, you amuse me so.

05-May-10

Amazon product recommendation whaaaa

The only possible connection I can see between these two items is that the author of the book on estrangement – the one I ordered1 – is, indeed, a lesbian, although her text (while it is inclusive of persons of varied backgrounds, including those of differing sexual orientations) has nothing to do with lesbianism per se, much less with lesbian sex.

It follows, then, that the next time I order a book on a nonsexual topic by a coincidentally hetero author, I’ll get product recommendations for books about dudes and ladies doin’ it, right?

Edited to add: My husband points out that (aside from the fact that someone, at some point, must have ordered these two books together, thus associating them in whatever wacky algorithm Amazon uses) queer folks are more likely to experience estrangement due to familial homophobia. This makes sense, of course, but still. 

More whimsically, one might wonder if there were a ghost in the Amazon machine that was simply out to taunt me since I haven’t been with a woman in 11 years (my, uh, “Chicago adventure,” after Jeff and I got back together, but before we were married), back when I was specifically boycotting Amazon.com, due to their usurpation of the company name from the oldest surviving feminist bookstore in the United States, Amazon Bookstore Cooperative in Minneapolis. I used to visit them with some regularity, which is about seven other stories, but anyway, they’re still taking orders, so do pay them a visit or find them online, although they’re now called True Colors, as member Ruta explains:

It is with mixed emotions that I am announcing that the store’s name is changing. This is not a decision I am making on a whim. Many of you will remember the lawsuit that Barb Wieser and the members of the cooperative brought against Amazon.com. They sued the on-line store over the use of the name, and won. But the victory came with a price, and it’s now time to pay. One of the conditions of the settlement was that if the brick-and-mortar store changed hands, rights to the name reverted to Amazon.com.

___
1Albeit with some ambivalence.

My hottest fantasy, if you must know

04-May-10

I acquire, for some miraculously cheap price, a vehicle whose most recent purpose has been to serve as a library system’s community bookmobile.

I load into it those used books with which I can bear to part, and commence with traveling the country, hitting library and thrift shop sales as I go, while also selling enough books to local and online retailers (the latter typically pay for media mail postage, so I’d just have to scrounge up a wifi connection and print packing slips) to pay for enough gas and food and tolls to get to the next city. (Paying for hotels, of course, would be ridiculous. I’d have a thick blanket roll and sleeping bag to settle down with on the floor, amid the books, or I’d stay with friends whom I’d otherwise have no ability to visit, anyway.)

I’d grab showers whenever and wherever possible. (I’d pack wet wipes for when such access doesn’t exist – such provisions being fairly luxurious, relative to previous times I’ve been homeless.)

Sometimes the fantasy involves being able to take kids, dogs, and/or my husband along for the ride; other times that doesn’t seem especially realistic, and I concede that “absence makes the heart grow fonder” (although I am not sure how I could be more fond of them), and look forward to being reunited with them.

I’d make select book donations as I traveled, to poor communities, battered women’s shelters, and the like.

I’d attend every gathering of both my “IRL” and Internet-based friends, and never have to ask for a couch on which to rest my weary head (or a shower in which to shampoo it), although I’d gratefully accept such offers when extended (especially the showers).

I’d park wherever it seemed like I could get away with it, without incurring fees or fines.

And in the moments between, I would read and write, free of distractions, such that by my journey’s end, I’d have at least one solid chunk of a manuscript done. (Needless to say, my cheap little netbook would never fail; I’d find wifi signal whenever necessary, and my blackberry wouldn’t crash even once, so my ability to communicate from the road – and navigate that road via the device’s GPS – would not be compromised.)

Also, the bookmobile would never break down, or run out of gas. (Variation on the fantasy: The bookmobile runs on recycled food oils, so I go from town to town making efficient use of these, spreading the scent of burritos or whatever as I go.)

Totally hot, right?!

So… Anybody have a spare bookmobile laying around?

Wearing Pappaw’s hat

19-Apr-10

Late last night, I learned that an object relevant to the hillbilly side of my family is in the Smithsonian.

My mother (who claims the unlikely identity of “half hillbilly, half Italian”), working to arrange her annual visit with the kids, wrote to my husband about all the possibilities. (He read parts of the email to me. I don’t snoop.)

One of the ideas was a visit in August, when she could take the girls to the Smithsonian, to see the train Pappaw had once conducted, hauling coal. (Pappaw was her Southern Baptist missionary grandfather, who, with Mammaw, raised her after their daughter abandoned my mother in Oklahoma, as referenced in the recent Easter post.)

If I ever knew that fact before, I’d since, somehow, forgotten it. (Another possibility: that the train hadn’t been installed there until at some point after our most recent estrangement.)

I would, of course, love to see that train myself.

Pappaw died of black lung, when I was 3. (Making him an extraordinarily long-living black lung sufferer. No doubt his conducting the train rather than – as far as I know, and I could surely be wrong – doing any number of other jobs for the coal company, played some part; at least he’d have seen daylight from time to time.)

I loved Pappaw something fierce. He was delightful. He had a big laugh and a kind heart. And at one point, though I never, as far as I know, got to see his train, I had his conductor hat.

Somewhere, there’s a picture of me wearing it, as a very little kid. (It used to be the first image you’d see at this website, back in 2004 or so.)

When my Internet isn’t cut off for nonpayment – l’m writing this, now, from a highly unstable blackberry (tangent: Good God y’all, my thumbs are killing me) – I’ll try to find one or another of the scanned copies I made years back, and repost it. But for now, I’ll summarize from imperfect memory:

In the picture, I’m seated on a mattress that’s directly on the floor – in my underwear, and a T-shirt emblazoned with the logo of the College of William and Mary, where my parents met, before my mother dropped out and they married (Pappaw officiating; their one wedding picture has his beaming face between theirs). I’m playing, for some reason, with my toes rather than the plastic toy radio (the only thing on the mattress besides me).

And I’m wearing Pappaw’s hat, and my usual “Very Serious” expression.

It kills me that I have no idea, now, what became of that hat. I couldn’t begin to guess what house that photo was taken in, either; we moved constantly, especially after my mother left my dad, breaking his and, she has said, also Pappaw’s heart. (According to my dad’s journals from that period, after they split, she was just as likely to, without warning, drop me off with him or my grandmother, as she was to righteously take me back into whatever her next short-lived arrangement was.)

I feel guilty for losing the hat, but I don’t even know if I’m the one who lost it, and if so, when, and with whom I was living at the time, in which region of the country.

But now, at 39, I realize there is something much larger of Pappaw’s which has survived, and which, in its way, can belong just as much to my mother as to my daughters as to me, as to anyone else in America: the train he led over and through all that difficult, strip-mined terrain.

I don’t imagine, for a moment, that it would be appropriate to tag along on whatever trip my mother may later take with the girls to D.C. Even if we were reconciled, that would just be too awkward, and I want my girls to get the best experience they can with her. (Whatever kind of mother she’s been to me, she has been an excellent grandmother to them, which is why it’s important to me that they see her, even if the logistics must be arranged through my husband.)

But if they go, I will ask them to take lots of pictures, and later, to share them with me, so we can all find that place again.

It’s as if Easter were meant to be an occasion of renewal

04-Apr-10

I remember Easter of last year as if it happened last week, because I never really left that moment; its impact at the time, while clearly enormous, has since been impossible for me to articulate. 

Before I explain what happened last Easter at the Richmond Friends Meetinghouse, a bit of background:

I’d been there before, in other capacities: in 1999 and 2000, as acting President of the local NOW chapter, we rented a meeting room once per week at the Meeting House, and earlier – one summer during my teens or early 20s – I’d visited there with a friend of my mother’s (whom I called my aunt), Kathy Benham, whose friends were having a commitment ceremony there. Both the NOW and Kathy stories are too huge to address here (the latter in particular; Kathy, I can at least note, is one of the women referenced here); for now, suffice it to say, it was in that earliest experience that I first felt “at home” in that Meetinghouse.

Here’s where it gets, even to my thinking, weird. My mother, from whom I’ve been estranged for going on five years (after an earlier estrangement, from 1993-1997), is also a Quaker. But she wasn’t always. As best I understand it, she came to that at some point in the mid-90s. Maybe following ‘Iniki, which devastated Kauai’s economy, leaving her with Oahu as her only option – a loss for many reasons, but one providing for opportunities that can only be obtained in an urban setting. Such as, to find a sizable group of generally like-minded people. In her case, Quakers.

My mother had been raised, during certain fragments of her childhood, by her missionary Southern Baptist preacher grandparents, and it had been, even with great difficulties and burdens, an experience of mercy. (Her mother, who’d abandoned her and her half-brothers in Oklahoma, which state located her brothers’ dad to come pick up his sons; Dennis wanted to take my mother, too, but the state wouldn’t let him, since he was not her father. Finally, her grandparents from Virginia were able to come get her.)

During this part of her upbringing – with Mammaw and Pappaw – one could say she got pretty well “churched.” The ideas she was exposed to then remained influential to her, even as she left Keokee, Virginia for “hippie” and “free-spirited” circles, in apparent contradiction with many of Pappaw’s teachings.

Religion, for my mother, was like a skin graft (an atheist, perhaps, would go with “artificial limb,” which also works), something that was painful, but necessary and protective. She could not, in later years – even if she’d wanted to – extract it, without suffering permanent collapse.

Quakerism, to interject, is something I feel specifically called not to explain to anyone (including other Quakers); Silence, here, is not experienced as “absence,” but its own rare, necessary Grace. (Nor, generally, do I experience my estrangement from my mother as “absence.” In many ways, we can be more present to each other than in any past or future possible situation. Back to that momentarily.) I dislike questions about my “beliefs” because what I have in Quakerism isn’t “belief” so much as (an extremely imperfect) “practice” or “process.” (See joke about its explicit ‘creedlessness’ here!) Preparing for a race, if you will, without imagining one will necessarily succeed in one’s objective (which may, itself, change), nor that one has any idea what lies at the end of the proverbial “track.”

It makes sense to me, anyway, that following those formative, but fragmentary Southern Baptist and “free-spirit”/hippie experiences, she finally became a Quaker. And maybe (quite likely), even before she went to Oahu and started going to Meeting, she’d already thought on this; she may have decided (as I did) she was a Quaker years before declaring that to another soul.

From when I was little, visiting my mother during Summer vacations (she’d given up custody of me before I entered 3rd grade), I had the habit of wandering the streets while she was at work. Sometimes, I’d walk into random churches – there were lots of these in Williamsburg, Virginia, clustered together within walking distance of my temporary home – to “test” whether I felt at home there. (Kinda like in Are You There, God? It’s Me, Margaret? – only without the puberty-specific worries, as I wasn’t quite there yet.)

I never did – feel “at home.” Not, anyway, until that day (weird I can’t pin down the year – likely, summer of ’86 or else ’90 – maybe as late as ’92) when I went with Kathy to that ceremony, at Richmond Friends Meeting House. I remember nothing about the ceremony. Kathy had two friends in particular, Roni and Rita, whom I’d seen from visits going back to when I was 13 or so; the couple has since had two children, the youngest of whom now attends Young Friends meetings with my oldest daughter. So – maybe it was Roni and Rita’s ceremony? But I can’t place it to save my life. (Yet I do remember, vividly, being at Roni and Rita’s decades ago, listening to a particular Bonnie Raitt song, and also borrowing their copy of May Sarton’s life-altering Journal of a Solitude; I have no earthly idea whether I managed to give it back; now, over the course of untold numbers of Meetings, potlucks and other church events, I’ve had several opportunities to ask if they remember me, but I still have not been able to do it. There’s no particular anxiety about it, though; again, here, Silence is its own valued state.)

But what I remember is that I did not only feel welcome in that Meetinghouse; I felt at home. The experience was positively jarring. I had no context for this “home” thing. (Read, if you will, Salman Rushdie’s Imaginary Homelands for salient takes on the ‘Perpetual Exile’ experience.) I said nothing about it, even to Kathy – to whom I was very close, and could tell almost anything. (Or, if I did tell her, I have no memory of it. Also entirely possible. Memory is a notoriously shifty bastard.)

So it was after that – during the years my mother and I were first not speaking to one another (from the day of my Minneapolis airport/FBI/psych unit of Hennepin County Medical Center debacle in September, 1993 to October of 1997, when I wrote to tell her she was a grandmother) – that she, as best I know, “became a Quaker.”

The chronology (feminists and/or linguists will understand the word choice) is relevant because I’ve been asked if I became a Quaker was out of a need to be – even in our estranged state – close to my Quaker mother.

The answer to that question is, of course, no.

And it’s also yes.

The fact is, we each “found” (can that be right? ‘found’?) Quakerism independently of one another, much as separated twins often develop similar habits. (Science is still supporting that, right? If not, I’d want to know. I do dislike imprecise metaphors.) The flip side of that independence being, of course, interdependence; we are as inseparable as we are separated.

__

Okay – so, if you’re still with me – back to last Easter.

There was a woman at Meeting whom I’d not seen there before – but, I was certain, recognized from somewhere. The logical conclusion was that she was one of Kathy’s old friends. I wondered if I’d met her in Richmond, or maybe in Pennsylvania, that one time Kathy had taken me up there.

At rise of Meeting, there was a performance of the visiting “Friendly Folkdancers,” of which group, I soon learned, this woman was a part. We went downstairs for the Easter event, consisting of “dances from peoples and regions that are, or have been, at war,” with the idea of “symbolically uniting them.” The dances were alternately moving and goofy (as Quakers tend to be), and during some moment between them, I worked up the nerve to approach this woman, and ask her where it was that I might know her from. (Recall here that I’ve been attending Meeting now for years with a number of people I know I met from when I was as young as 13, and yet have not felt compelled to similarly approach any of them.)

The woman told me her name: Rosemary Coffey, and my synapses went into rapid-fire mode; I knew that name, too, but couldn’t place that, either.

I brought up Kathy. Rosemary had no idea who I was talking about. I mentioned Pennsylvania. She was now living in Pittsburgh, Rosemary said, although before that, she’d lived in Honolulu for quite a while.

“Oh,” I said matter-of-factly. “You probably know my mother.”

“What’s her name?” Rosemary asked.

“Suzanne Marinelli,” I said.

“Oh, yes,” Rosemary answered.

“We’re estranged,” I added.

“Yes,” Rosemary replied, looking at me with a great kindness. “I know.”

___

Later, after another of the dances, Rosemary approached me. Said something to the effect that my mother would like me to call. I said something like “I know.”

I did know, and I know the same is probably true today. I also know that I can’t call her. Not won’t, but can’t. We may never speak again, in fact. This is our longest estrangement, and we are both only getting older.

But in the years that have passed, in silence, between us, I have only grown to love and forgive her more. It’s been enormously liberating. Reverential, even. And… safe. Not endangered by actual, direct communication. All the more precious and necessary to me.

I miss my mother terribly, and I don’t miss her at all. She’s lost to me, and I see her everywhere I go. Including in the face of a lifelong Quaker named Rosemary, whom I was certain I knew but, we finally concluded, whom I could not have met, prior to that Easter, one year ago.

In that moment, I experienced a bit of death, and a bit of resurrection.

This, finally, is what Easter means to me.

That, and this.